OpenAI considers rebranding data centers to ‘AI computing campuses’ as data center backlash intensifies – company sees 2028 presidential election becoming an ‘AI issue’
Follow us
Add us as a preferred source on Google
Subscribe to our newsletter
OpenAI is reportedly preparing a major public relations campaign to influence how Americans view artificial intelligence, including a proposal to rename its data centers as “AI Compute Campuses.” Axios Reports. The initiative comes ahead of the November 3 US midterm elections and forms a broader effort to influence the debate around AI ahead of the 2028 presidential race. Chris Lehane, OpenAI’s chief global affairs officer, noted that the Mediterranean “would be a bit of a movie trailer for what you’re going to see in 2028.” He expects AI to be a big issue for presidential candidates as the technology raises concerns about its impact on jobs, the economy and the environment.
Go deeper with TH Premium: AI in data centers
(Image credit: Microsoft)
OpenAI’s proposed terminology change has been ongoing since August as the company focuses on promoting safeguards for the powerful technology, which Lehane described as “speed limits.” The proposed AI compute campuses is particularly interesting because it comes as opposition to large data centers is accelerating across the US. Data centers require huge amounts of electricity and water, with nearby communities raising concerns about noise, air pollution, rising utility bills and limited public consultation. OpenAI hopes to address these concerns through community agreements and another way of presenting the infrastructure. “Compute campuses better describe the role of the infrastructure we’re rebuilding for AI,” a company spokesperson said separately. He added that these projects represent long-term investments in IT, energy infrastructure and skilled jobs.
The latest proposal follows similar efforts by other technology companies to improve their relationship with communities that host their infrastructure. In January, Microsoft announced a community-first approach, promising to cover the increase in electricity costs associated with its data centers, and to invest in local infrastructure and jobs. However, while changing the name may be easier, changing public opinion can bring some headaches. A Redfin report in May found that 47% of Americans surveyed are against a new data center built in their community. Another report in August detailed how negotiations between developers and local authorities often take place behind non-disclosure agreements, leaving residents without access to important project information.
Latest Videos FromTom’s hardware
The resistance also affected actual building plans. At least 19 Michigan Municipalities have already moved to restrict new data center developments after OpenAI and Oracle’s $16 billion Stargate project went ahead with their project in Sanile Township despite local opposition. Meanwhile, Amazon abandoned plans for four data centers in Northern Virginia last month following community pushback.
OpenAI is not alone in trying to reshape the language around AI. President Donald Trump previously pushed for the terminology change, directing federal agencies and urging AI companies to replace artificial intelligence with “super intelligence.” Trump announced the change in late September argued that the word “artificial” makes the technology sound “fake”. His administration subsequently instructed State Department employees to use super intelligence, or SI, in official directives, websites, reports and policy documents.
Some technology leaders have also embraced the terminology. Nvidia CEO Huang has previously referred to data centers as “superintelligence factories”. Elon Musk announced plans to rename its AI company SpaceXAI to SpacexSI last month. Meanwhile, Meta has established Meta Superintelligence Laboratories in 2025, and Microsoft has also assembled a team focused on the development of superintelligence. OpenAI’s proposed terminology will now face a more difficult test than simply finding a name as communities still want answers on the issues raised. Lehane, however, acknowledged that public scrutiny is part of the process and says, “Communities should hold companies accountable and responsible so that they really and truly get a transformative benefit from these projects.”
follow Tom’s Hardware on Google Newsor add us as a preferred sourceto get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom’s Hardware’s best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.